On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:51:18PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 03/03/2014 07:36 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > > On 03/03/2014 02:45 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > >> Do our tests already cover all of these filesystems? > > > > I think so but now that I look at this again, it looks like I > > forgot to fix the tests. Currently they skip on !512 byte sector > > size. I'll fix that. > > So the best looking test to do this appears to be t1700-probe-fs. The > problem is that it uses a loop file instead of a real device, and so > does not really simulate !512 byte sectors. Also when I tried adding > jfs, ntfs, and hfs, I found that hfs does not support -V ( version ) > to test if it is supported, and mkfs.ntfs exits with an error status > when run with -V, and mkfs.jfs tries to do an interactive prompt to > really use a file instead of a device, and redirecting stdin to > /dev/null causes it to crash with a SIGABRT. I suppose for the time > being, this just may just have to be an untested feature. > > I did update the patch for the recent addition of btrfs support, and > so will follow up this email with that. >
Sounds good for now. -- Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
