sudo parted /dev/sda unit co print unit s print
[sudo] password for ggs:
Model: ATA CONSISTENT M.2 S (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 128GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:

Number  Start   End     Size    File system  Name                  Flags
 1      1049kB  630MB   629MB   fat32        EFI System Partition  boot, esp
 3      630MB   1704MB  1074MB  ext4                               bls_boot
 4      1704MB  40.0GB  38.3GB
 2      40.0GB  62.0GB  22.0GB  ext4
 5      62.0GB  77.0GB  15.0GB  btrfs
 6      77.0GB  92.0GB  15.0GB  btrfs
 7      92.0GB  107GB   15.0GB  btrfs
 8      107GB   108GB   1074MB  ext4                               bls_boot
 9      108GB   128GB   20.0GB

Model: ATA CONSISTENT M.2 S (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 250069680s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:

Number  Start       End         Size       File system  Name
   Flags
 1      2048s       1230847s    1228800s   fat32        EFI System
Partition  boot, esp
 3      1230848s    3327999s    2097152s   ext4
  bls_boot
 4      3328000s    78125055s   74797056s
 2      78125056s   121094143s  42969088s  ext4
 5      121094144s  150390783s  29296640s  btrfs
 6      150390784s  179687423s  29296640s  btrfs
 7      179687424s  208984063s  29296640s  btrfs
 8      208984064s  211081215s  2097152s   ext4
  bls_boot
 9      211081216s  250068991s  38987776s

-------------------------------------------------


(parted) align-check 2 opt
parted: invalid token: 2
alignment type(min/opt)  [optimal]/minimal? opt
Partition number? 2


You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:

Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:

Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:

http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/

Please check this version prior to bug reporting.

If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:

http://www.gnu.org/software/parted

for further information.

Your report should contain the version of this release (3.6)
along with the error message below, the output of

parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print

and the following history of commands you entered.
Also include any additional information about your setup you
consider important.

Command History:
print
set unit GiB
help
unit GiB
print
unit kib
ls
print devices
print free
print
print list
print
print all
clear
clear
align-check 2 opt
opt
2

Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)
Backtrace has 12 calls on stack:
  12: /lib64/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x5b) [0x7f52c3ffc6bb]
  11: parted(+0x49a0) [0x561aba3bc9a0]
  10: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a450) [0x7f52c3d8b450]
  9: /lib64/libparted.so.2(+0xcbc5) [0x7f52c4003bc5]
  8: /lib64/libparted.so.2(ped_device_get_optimum_alignment+0x29)
[0x7f52c4003ae9]
  7: parted(+0x434a) [0x561aba3bc34a]
  6: parted(+0xa363) [0x561aba3c2363]
  5: parted(interactive_mode+0x17e) [0x561aba3c304e]
  4: parted(main+0x12c4) [0x561aba3bb8b4]
  3: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x3448) [0x7f52c3d74448]
  2: /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8b) [0x7f52c3d7450b]
  1: parted(_start+0x25) [0x561aba3bb945]


You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:

Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:

Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:

http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/

Please check this version prior to bug reporting.

If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:

http://www.gnu.org/software/parted

for further information.

Your report should contain the version of this release (3.6)
along with the error message below, the output of

parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print

and the following history of commands you entered.
Also include any additional information about your setup you
consider important.

Assertion (0) at ui.c:358 in function sa_sigsegv_handler() failed.

Reply via email to