Karl, 2012/9/13 Karl Berry <[email protected]>: > [...] > checking attr/error_context.h usability... yes > checking attr/error_context.h presence... yes > checking for attr/error_context.h... yes > checking attr/libattr.h usability... yes > checking attr/libattr.h presence... yes > checking for attr/libattr.h... yes > checking for library containing attr_copy_file... -lattr > checking for attr_copy_file... yes > [...] > gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../lib -I../lib -DENABLE_MERGE > -g -O2 -MT util.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/util.Tpo -c -o util.o util.c > util.c: In function 'copy_attr_check': > util.c:202:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'attr_copy_action' > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > util.c:203:34: error: 'ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS' undeclared (first use in this > function) > util.c:203:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for > each function it appears in > make[2]: *** [util.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/u/local/gnu/src/patch-2.7/src' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/u/local/gnu/src/patch-2.7' > make: *** [all] Error 2
is attr/libattr.h on CentOS 5.8 too old to define ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS? Which package does your attr/libattr.h belong to (rpm -qf)? Thanks, Andreas
