2017-09-04 18:04 GMT+02:00 Benno Schulenberg <bensb...@telfort.nl>: > > Andreas, > > Op 4-09-2017 om 14:15 schreef Andreas Grünbacher: >> >> I'm getting the following result with current patch, which differs >> from what you are getting: >> >> $ patch -i goes-wrong.patch -o testor.c.out testor.c >> patching file testor.c.out (read from testor.c) >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 7 with fuzz 1. >> Hunk #2 succeeded at 56 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines). > > > That is what I get when I apply the patch a second time. I'm pretty > sure your testor.c file has already been patched/modified -- because > if not, and the first hunk applies with fuzz 1, the second one should > apply with no fuzz and offset 0 lines. The offset of 8 lines means > that already two hunks of 4 lines have been inserted. > > The original testor.c has this: > $ wc testor.c > 95 388 2719 testor.c
Not in my testing: $ wc testor.c 103 415 2983 testor.c $ file testor.c testor.c: ASCII text, with CRLF line terminators Andreas
