On 5/9/23 23:36, Dennis Clarke via Bug reports, suggestions, general discussion for GNU patch. wrote:
On 5/9/23 11:00, Bruno Haible wrote:
 > Dennis Clarke wrote:
 >> Seems to be a problem where a trivial Bourne shell for the user is not
 >> good enough?
 >
 > What if you install GNU bash:
 >


After all that disaster I had a thought : what about that silly and
poorly documented env var CONFIG_SHELL ?

bash-5.1$ echo $CONFIG_SHELL
/usr/pkg/bin/bash
bash-5.1$

Guess what ?

============================================================================
Testsuite summary for GNU patch 2.7.6
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 44
# PASS:  42
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 2
# FAIL:  0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================

Gotta love the need for GNU bash for this to work. Makes no sense at all
for "patch".




--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
Four decades in production systems.


  • bizarre failur... Bug reports, suggestions, general discussion for GNU patch.
    • Re: bizar... Bruno Haible
      • Re: b... Bug reports, suggestions, general discussion for GNU patch.
        • R... Bug reports, suggestions, general discussion for GNU patch.
          • ... Bruno Haible
            • ... Bug reports, suggestions, general discussion for GNU patch.
              • ... Bruno Haible

Reply via email to