On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 3/27/11 6:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> i think it should die. otherwise, i imagine some people wont notice. >>> if they're installing by hand, they'll probably clobber the old files >>> (headers/static), and could possibly continue using the old shared >>> library. if they're installing via a package manager, the guy taking >>> care of that can easily include the patch so that the end person never >>> notices. >> >> some further thoughts ... i'm not aware of another package of the top >> of my head that has this behavior, and it hasnt been an impediment to >> their usage. plus, if people really want the "ignore the failure and >> do it anyways" aspect, they always have make's -k option available to >> them. > > It's OK, you've convinced me.
thanks. hopefully i didnt annoy you too much in the process ;). -mike _______________________________________________ Bug-readline mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline
