On 8/25/16 3:55 PM, Simon Sobisch wrote: > I'd rather like to see a MinGW build for the GnuCOBOL 2.0 release than a > VisualStudio build just "because it compiles directly and the MinGW > build does not". And this is exactly what is happening with the people > testing our release candidate. > > readline doesn't compile because of the SIGNALs SIGHUP and SIGQUIT that > are missing in windows (and therefore in the mingw headers, too). > > Looking at Readline 6.3 there are at least signals.c (missing #ifdef > SIGHUP, already has #ifdef SIGQUIT) and input.c (missing both) that > needs a fix. > > Can you please fix both (and grep for other files possibly needing a > fix) and include them in the "offical" readline-master.tar.gz?
I'll fix SIGHUP and SIGQUIT for readline-7.0. Are there any other common
Unix signals that MinGW doesn't provide?
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU [email protected] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-readline mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline
