On 2/6/21 10:30 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
Noticed the build problem on i686-w64-mingw32 target as:
```
i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DCROSS_COMPILING -I. -I.
-DRL_LIBRARY_VERSION='"8.1"' -DBRACKETED_PASTE_DEFAULT=1 -g -O2
-Wno-parentheses -Wno-format-security signals.c
signals.c: In function '_rl_handle_signal':
signals.c:270:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'sigprocmask'
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
270 | sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK, &set, &oset);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
signals.c:270:15: error: 'SIG_BLOCK' undeclared (first use in this function);
did you mean 'SIG_ACK'?
270 | sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK, &set, &oset);
| ^~~~~~~~~
| SIG_ACK
signals.c:270:15: note: each undec
```
The change guards sigprocmask() the same way SIG_UNBLOCK
is guarded a few lines below.
Thanks for the report.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU [email protected] http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
