On 4/4/25 1:30 PM, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Package: readline-common
Version: 8.2-6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

    * What led up to the situation?

      Checking for defects with a new version

test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man 
page"

Thanks for your message.

The bash and readline manual pages have all undergone extensive editing
and modification since the release of bash-5.2/readline-8.2, driven in part
by multi-message email threads starting with, among others:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2024-01/msg00167.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2024-03/msg00233.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2024-11/msg00161.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2024-12/msg00093.html

I recommend you look at the versions of the man pages you're interested in
in the bash and readline devel git branches:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/?h=devel
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/readline.git/?h=devel

and use those as a base for your testing.

Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    c...@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to