Well as both -s and -p are present it would seem sensible that they worked. If there is an issue with it not working why is it present in a broken format and not corrected?
JG Bob Proulx wrote: >>Are you aware that uname -a gives incorrect output? or rather missing >>the -p, --processor print the host processor type feature? >> > > Note that the -p option is not standard. For portable applications > you should avoid using that option. In fact the uname functionality > is such that portable scripts should probably avoid all but the -s > option. > > http://www.unix-systems.org/single_unix_specification_v2/xcu/uname.html > > Bob > > > _______________________________________________ Bug-sh-utils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-sh-utils
