Thanks a lot!
I've applied your patch and added a test for the bug.
"Tim J. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe there's a bug in the pathchk utility in GNU sh-utils 2.0j.
> Instead of checking the return value of the function against zero, it checks
> the address of the function, which is never equal.
>
> The fix is trivial:
>
> --- pathchk.c.old Tue May 21 20:29:23 2002
> +++ pathchk.c Tue May 21 20:30:38 2002
> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
> if (!last_elem)
> {
> exists = dir_ok (path);
> - if (dir_ok == 0)
> + if (exists == 0)
> {
> free (parent);
> return 1;
_______________________________________________
Bug-sh-utils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-sh-utils
