Daniel Kjeserud wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] kjes]$ uname --help Thanks for the report. But 'uname --version' would have been best.
> Report bugs to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] kjes]$ uname -v > #1 Fri Jan 31 06:51:30 EST 2003 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] kjes]$ uname -r > 2.4.18-24.8.0 > > ---------------- > Do you see the problem? No I do not see the problem in the above output. > Just a simple write fault. > Just wanted to bring it to your attention. Everything looks fine to me. Perhaps a cut-n-paste missed posting the problem? Here is the output from my machine. uname --version uname (GNU sh-utils) 2.0.11 uname -v #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 uname -r 2.4.18-k7 Really, though, the only portable output to count on from the uname command is uname with no options. That prints the system name. All else is os dependent. I recommend avoiding it. (However, uname -a is useful for reporting bugs to tell us what system you are using all in one pass.) Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-sh-utils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-sh-utils
