has there been any more fixes to --listed-incremental's behavior since tar-1.15.2-20060210?
i use that flag all the time and it does seem to be working better than it was in december, but for some new areas i'm backing up it is triggering a full backup again after the previous run. when i look into the listed incr file it only contains directory names, is this correct!? it is very possible that nothing new was added to the file system since the last run so maybe that is all it needs to know? also, what is the diff with the trailing slash here?: GNU tar-1.15.2-1 1142271959 66148000 1141051465 0 2150 2 /ftp/.omi/001/ 1142271631 0 2150 10731521 /ftp/.omi/001/OMTO3G/ 1141351279 0 2150 10731521 /ftp/.omi/001/OMTO3G what is the format of the above (is its description in the tar docs somewhere in the dist)?: GNU tar-version date ? date ? devnum ? file(dir?)name _______________________________________________ Bug-tar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-tar
