"Jan Psota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Latest TCP script at the bottom (3180 bytes).
> 4 tests: 64bit dual core Athlon tmpfs / disk (reiserfs) - 60MB/s,
>       32bit Athlon tmpfs / disk (reiserfs) - 55MB/s
> Both machines were idle -- used for testing only.
> Tarball and extracted files were on different physical devices.
> Test data: linux 2.6.22/3 kernel sources for memory operations,
> for the other data average file size should bring enough info.
>
> 2 x [...] processor means 1 processor with 2 cores (2 entries in cpuinfo).
> Archive format is set to pax (Joerg).
> Let's end with it. I only wanted to send You a new version of TCP script :-).
>
> --
> Jan Psota
>
> TCP, version 2007-10-25
> Linux 2.6.22-suspend2-r2 / Gentoo Base System release 2.0.0_rc5
> 2012MB of memory, 2 x AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ 2211.348 
> 512 KB 4426.24 bmips
> gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (Gentoo 4.2.2 p1.0)
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=k8 -pipe"

Please explain how you did compile star. Setting CFLAGS will cause the 
compilation to fail.



> bsdtar:       bsdtar 2.3.4 - libarchive 2.3.4
> gnutar:       tar (GNU tar) 1.19
> star: star: star 1.5a85 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
>
> best time of 5 repetitions,
>       src=linux-2.6.23, 291M in 23867 files, avg 13KB/file,
>       archive=/tmp/tcp.tar, extract to /tmp/tcptmp
> program       operation       real    user    system  %CPU         speed
> bsdtar        create          0.764   0.232   0.532   99.96       370308 KB/s
> gnutar        create          0.743   0.200   0.512   95.87       380775 KB/s
> star  create          0.587   0.040   0.820   100.00      441247 KB/s

Please try to explain why star in your tests takes more system CPU time than
other programs.


> bsdtar        list            0.164   0.096   0.068   99.84      1579341 KB/s
> gnutar        list            0.218   0.064   0.152   98.92      1188128 KB/s
> star  list            0.359   0.044   0.240   79.09       721481 KB/s

Star's list speed is the same as with gtar, please explain your results.


> bsdtar        extract         0.733   0.200   0.504   96.02       353358 KB/s
> gnutar        extract         0.625   0.092   0.508   96.02       414419 KB/s
> star  extract         0.875   0.096   0.980   100.00      296013 KB/s

In a comparable test, star never extracts slower than gtar.
Please explain your results.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


Reply via email to