On Thursday 10 April 2008, Vitaly V. Ch wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > just debating whether to back port the lzma updates to tar-1.19 or just > > wait for tar-1.20. if the answer is "nfc", that's fine :). > > I like to wait tar-1.20 with lzma. who want lzma in tar-1.19 can apply > patch
that doesnt answer my question: is there a date/timeframe in mind for tar-1.20 ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
