On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Sergey Poznyakoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Patched, did you? It need not be patched, it already contains all > needed changes. Didn't patch warn you about it? (something like this: > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]). You're right. I didn't patch it. I must have confused that with the release version. But otherwise, I did check the latest one you sent me and it *doesn't* work the expected way.
