Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
halfdog<[email protected]> ha escrit:
I've sent the same request 04/27/2010 to bug-cpio, but haven't got
Perhaps you did not. If you did, it would show up in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-cpio.
I looked into both, tar and cpio, archives, it seems that my mails need some
kind of approval, the tar list message was sent:
29 Apr 2010 05:54:48 +0000
was, accepted by list 30 min later on gnu side
Received: from [88.116.147.190] (port=51826 helo=mail.halfdog.net)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1O7N8I-0006ZW-56
for [email protected]; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:21:58 -0400
and sent back 36hrs later (thats why a morning 29.4 message is in the 30.4
archives, afternoon)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33517 helo=lists.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1O7tkl-00068E-0R
for [email protected]; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:11:51 -0400
So I'll see, if the cpio message also shows up later on.
If not, is there someone to contact for security issues in cpio and
tar?
For all issues regarding GNU tar, please write to this list
(i.e.<[email protected]>). For anything regarding GNU cpio, write to
<[email protected]>.
Yes, I guess, I'll do that. I just wait some days for a first risk assessment,
and if risk low, which has quite likely, will provide more info here.
Thanks, Roman
