On pátek 11. srpna 2023 16:49:31 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On pátek 11. srpna 2023 14:32:18 CEST Ed Santiago wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 08:33:03AM +0200, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote: > > > Hi Ed, > > > > > > > The --delete flag in 1.35 can generate a tarball that is > > > > unreadable by podman and possibly other tools using the > > > > Go tar library: > > > > > > Unfortunately I cannot reproduce it, > > > > > > > $ podman create --name a quay.io/libpod/testimage:20221018 > > > > $ podman export a >/tmp/a.tar > > > > $ tar --delete -f /tmp/a.tar home/podman/pause > > > > > > Can you send me the a.tar archive before and after delete. > > > or put them somewhere so I can download them? > > > > Curious! It's 100% reproducible on my end. I've attached ante > > and post (before/after, but ASCII sortable) to: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230127 > > > > ...and added a comment describing the dups found with > > > > tar tf a.post.tar | sort | uniq -cd > > Is this related to some of the Fedora downstream patches? FTR, here are > "vanilla" GNU tar RPM builds: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/praiskup/tar-upstream-head/ > > The CI is has not been building for a few days now, needs upstream fix: > https://www.mail-archive.com/bug-tar@gnu.org/msg06277.html
I can confirm I can reproduce the behavior even with vanilla tar (in Fedora Rawhide container, on Fedora 38 host). Pavel > Adding maintainer to CC. > Pavel > > > Hope this helps, > > Ed > > > >