> From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 19:26:18 +0100
>
> If there is a blank line following a @table command then an invalid
> <br> added.
It's not a bug, it's intentional behavior. It is there to prevent
some losing browsers from rendering tables in a very ugly way. I
believe there's a comment there which hints about why this is needed.
Does that <br> produce some adverse effects? If so, please describe
the details.
> Also, is there a typo in the file insertion.c?
> It says
> /* Force the browser to render one blank line before
> each new @item in a table. But don't do that unless
> this is the first <dt> after the <dl>, or if we are
> converting @itemx.
> but should it say
> /* Force the browser to render one blank line before
> each new @item in a table. But don't do that *if*
> this is the first <dt> after the <dl>, or if we are
> converting @itemx.
Yes, this is a typo. Thanks for catching it.
_______________________________________________
Bug-texinfo mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
