Eli Zaretskii writes:

> > That's exactly my point: When it cannot produce output due to syntax
> > errors in the input, it just gives an error message and exit(1), but
> > doesn't remove the existing foobar.o file.
> 
> As Karl explained, makeinfo produces output as a side effect of its 
> parsing of input, which is different from how GCC works.

I appreciate that Karl is willing to change the implementation of
makeinfo in order to match users' desires better.

Bruno

_______________________________________________
Bug-texinfo mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo

Reply via email to