Me> It really ought to be equivalent to inlining the foo file, i.e.,
Karl> I'm not sure @include should be exactly equivalent to inlining. ! If if does not, it certainly kills part of the usefulness of include :( And especially that of includeverbatim. Karl> In your case it should. But I seem to recall bug reports about Karl> this, wanting it to at least start a new paragraph This is weird: what's wrong with putting an empty line before the include if that's your intent? Created new files certainly prevents some uses of include, while include = inline keeps all the possibilities. Karl> Anyway, I'll take a look. Thanks Karl! Of course, there is no urgency :) _______________________________________________ Bug-texinfo mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
