[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > Personally I don't object to making @smallbook always be smaller, for > the sake of wide examples. Bob, rms, anyone?
Good! I don't care too much what path is taken. If this patch doesn't get in, I would suggest to provide another way to get examples with small fonts, maybe by adding a macro @smallexamplefonts, and make the documentation on this more accurate. > Maybe we should have @tinyexample too. Sigh. > > If you put this in, would you accept a patch that adds @smallverbatim > and @smallverbatiminclude (if that's easily possible)? > > Sounds good to me. Ok, I might wait (a bit) for consensus on this. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ Bug-texinfo mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
