On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Karl Berry wrote:
> This isn't valid HTML 4.01
>
> What's not valid about <small>? It's also used for @sc.
>
> Anyway, there's nothing deep about the <small>, it was just inserted
> because someone (I'm not sure who any more) thought the ... looked
> better that way.
That'd be me:
1999-02-18 Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* makeinfo/cmds.c (cm_dots, cm_enddots): Don't produce … for
HTML, as too many browsers don't support it; use "..." in a
smaller font.
I do think <small>...</small> looks better than just ... Try it.
_______________________________________________
Bug-texinfo mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo