The "<br />" is okay; but "<meta ... />" and "<link ... />" are problems for ordinary HTML. Since Gerald points this out, I guess I was unclear on just what tags you were going to change to have " />". Sorry about that.
I agree that getting Texinfo output to display correctly on all browsers is more important than conforming to an HTML standard. But where we can also conform to a standard, we should. The standards are useful in that they reduce the space across which browsers have to work. What's the harm in giving a DOCTYPE that states the HTML standard that the output is the closest to conforming to? Adding such a line takes us closer to conformance and doesn't break any browser, so why not do it. < Stephen _______________________________________________ Bug-texinfo mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
