En r�ponse � Jos� Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The fact is that at this point only 4 out of 37 texinfo generated XML > docbooks (including huge stuff such as glibc and gcc) have bad XML > syntax. >
Hello, I'm very glad to see that the Docbook output has such a success. Could you give me the names of these 4 manuals? I'll try to have a look at the problems causing the bad XML syntax. In the other hand, the Docbook output lacks some important features, principally the definition commands (@deffn and such). Did you find some manuals using these constructs? Thanks, -- Philippe _______________________________________________ Bug-texinfo mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
