Hello,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:46:42AM +0000, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:31:00PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote:
> > - Simply do not try to break the index terms.
> >
> > I think this would be best, because there's no guarantee that a comma in
> > the index entry means a secondary index entry. We need to add real
> > multi-level indexing support to Texinfo, not kludge it up with text
> > analysis.
> See attached. It's an easy change, but relatively big as alot of stuff
> isn't needed anymore, so it should be reviewed carefully.
a humble comment: since it seems that some support for multilevel
indexing is planned, wouldn't it be better to leave the stuff there,
only disable it?
Won't the new code look similarily to the old one?
Like this:
> /* Used to separate primary and secondary entries in an index */
> -#define INDEX_SEP ", "
> +#define INDEX_SEP "This string will never appear." /* was: ", " */
It also can be viewed as "the more careful attitude".
Sorry if this idea is silly, :-)
Stepan
_______________________________________________
Bug-texinfo mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
