Hello,
I apologize that I step in again.
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 06:45:31PM -0400, Karl Berry wrote:
> we have to have the dual/complex implementation. Sorry Akim.
But should the ``old behaviour'' stay exactly as it is?
Or should it do the work in a tmp subdir and copy the xref files forth
and back?
I think Akim should pick what's easier for him to implement.
> I don't like --mostlyclean [...] DVI files should be removed
> at `clean', not `mostlyclean'.
OK, dvi, ps and pdf would be removed at `clean'.
But should't `mostlyclean' remove the xref files? (I mean all but dvi, ps
and pdf.) So the *.t2d and *.t2p subdirs would be removed by `mostlyclean'.
Have a nice day,
Stepan
_______________________________________________
Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
