[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > Hi Simon, > > Shouldn't @verbatiminclude use -I's too? > > Yes, and as far as I can tell it does. My simple test worked, and the > code is calling find_and_load(1) to use path searching in both cases, > from handle_include in makeinfo/cmds.c. > > So something must be different about your situation. Any ideas?
Hi Karl! Sorry about the delay, I get delayed... Looking into this further, it seems the problem wasn't makeinfo but texi2dvi. I solved this by putting the following in Makefile.am: TEXI2DVI = texi2dvi -I $(top_srcdir)/examples AM_MAKEINFOFLAGS = -I $(top_builddir)/doc -I $(top_srcdir)/examples This seems somewhat redundant, and hard coding TEXI2DVI = texi2dvi is sub-optimal too. Isn't there a better way to tell makeinfo+texi2dvi etc, via automake, where it should search for *.texi files? In other words, one central place to specify the -I's for building *.texi files. Perhaps this is moving into an automake bug rather than an texinfo bug, but if you have any ideas, that would be useful. Thanks, Simon _______________________________________________ Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/ [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
