Here it is. Wording is bad, but everything is there...
Thanks Patrice. I'll append my revised version. One thing I left out,
since I didn't understand:
Lone braces @[EMAIL PROTECTED] and @[EMAIL PROTECTED] do not trigger errors
in @code{@@math}.
makeinfo complains about @math{foo}} for me, since of course it thinks
the argument is "foo", leaving a spurious }. It also complains about
@math{{foo}. What mismatched-brace input were you seeing that went through?
Thanks,
Karl
...
The @code{@@math} command has no special effect on the Info and HTML
output. @command{makeinfo} expands any @code{@@}-commands as usual,
but it does not try to produce good mathematical formatting in any
way.
Plain @TeX{} commands are allowed in @code{@@math}. This allows you
to conveniently write superscripts and subscripts (as in the above
example), and also to use all the plain @TeX{} math control sequences
for symbols, functions, and so on, and thus get proper formatting in
the @TeX{} output, at least.
That is, as far as the @TeX{} output is concerned, @samp{\} is an
escape character inside @code{@@math}, and in fact it's best to use
@samp{\} instead of @samp{@@} for any such mathematical commands;
otherwise, @command{makeinfo} will complain.
Here's an example:
...
