On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 07:39:59PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote: > Not to worry. It's not an unreasonable suggestion. Just one I don't > want to take :).
Sure. > Both existing command names (makeinfo, texi2html) will continue to work > forever, as far as I'm concerned. Despite their suboptimal nature, I > don't see anything to be gained by adding more. Definitely not > output-specific ones. Great. > Automake will use the new implementation of makeinfo automatically, once > it is released and installed on a given system :). It won't be > immediate, as Patrice said. Okay, that makes sense. > I don't exactly understand why it matters now for your use of Automake. Are > you talking about make dist? Or something else? Oh, maybe I am getting confused. I am writing some software that uses Texinfo as an input format and I am also writing the manual, which must pass through Texinfo. For the latter part, I have been playing with the HTML output facilities and I might be getting mixed up what emails are related to what. Thanks for the ongoing help! -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
