On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:48:17AM -0500, Karl Berry wrote: > > > (I don't know what we're going do with chapter-split HTML) > It goes in a subdir like split by node html. > > I know, but what is its name? And what about the splitting at other > levels that texi2html supports?
It has the same default directory name than the split by node output. And similarly for the third split possibility (by section). I am not sure that we should decide ourselves for a specific name, I think that in most cases the usere will only use one possibility of splitting, and if it is not the case, he can use -o . > > -> foo.dbk (Docbook) > It is also foo.xml (unless I missed something). > > You're right again, but it makes no sense to me to output both xml and > docbook to the same extension. Maybe we should change it. Hmm. If .dbk is recognized as docbook, then it would make sense to use it, but in my experience docbook docs are always ending in .xml. It is not that problematic to have the xml output and the docbook output ending with the same extension, since in general the xml output is here as a temporary output that is to be modified, say, by an xslt transformation. > > When there is no @setfilename, the texinfo input file basename is > used by makeinfo for the output file basename. So, if it is possible > to so this in TeX too, maybe then @setfilename could become > optional? > > It is theoretically possible, but far from easy. For now @setfilename > must stay required for TeX. Ok. -- Pat
