On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Karl Berry wrote:
What is the official way to get a proper '&' in texinfo?
Is the proper one bold or roman, in your eyes?
The bold one looks wrong to me.
Since C++ is a typed language, unlike Lisp, it seems like @deftypefun
and @deftypemethod are the proper things to use. And in that case, the
& is printed in roman.
In C++, you have constructors that are missing a return type (for a few of
them I would use the return type slot to put "explicit", but for most of
them there is simply nothing to put there).
If that's what you wanted, it seems the remaining question is the extra
space. I don't see it. If you're not using the latest texinfo.tex,
please try that (you can get it from tug.org:tex/texinfo.tex, among many
other places). Unless you meant makeinfo output; I didn't try running
makeinfo on it.
Yes, I meant the makeinfo output. I didn't even know there was an other
way to get the output in info format...
(No question that the whole typed vs. untyped support is suboptimal.)
Thank you for your kind answer,
--
Marc Glisse
