On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 03:19:49PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote: > Otherwise I tend to agree that we should just declare \ paths to be > known not to work, until somebody does a patch. > > I've come to believe we should not even accept a patch. Any such > support would tend to be pervasive, destabilizing, and require further > work in who-knows-how-many-places. And furthermore, \ paths are not > going to work in texinfo.tex, ever. > > Texinfo has existed for some 25 years without supporting \ paths, so I > simply cannot believe we need to start now.
Ok. I sort of assumed that makeinfo in C supported \ paths. -- Pat
