Karl Berry wrote: > +@include doclicense.texi > > How about naming the file fdl.texi, like virtually every other package does?
If it really helps you, we could rename it. We'll have to change 58 files, several of which also live in other repositories. It won't make any difference to this issue (I assume), because it is info.info that is the problem, not info.texi. So I think you could just live with that difference. And in any case, trying to make the Texinfo and Emacs info.infos literally identical is never going to work IMO. We can never be sure that the installed versions of Texinfo and Emacs are going to match. My suggestion is that you and Emacs do nothing, and leave the people packaging Texinfo and Emacs to sort this out.
