Per Bothner wrote (on Mon, 12 Aug 2013 at 09:33 -0700): > In both cases, Werner is not opposed to warnings - he explicitly > says he doesn't want to use --no-warn because he wants useful warnings. > > The problem is warnings that one can't shut up - he is asking for > how to rewrite to source to avoid warnings.
Great, then I can find no-one in the archives who really objects to more warnings (haven't looked _that_ closely though). > Some people/organizations have a policy (or at least preference) that > builds be warning-free. This is a good discipline. I'd like builds to be free of easily caught bugs. If makeinfo won't help me with that, I'll add a comment to the notes for making an Emacs release (which are already long enough) to run a trivial grep to find bad node names.
