I downloaded http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/texinfo/texinfo.tex into the doc/
directory of my package. Now "make pdf" works successfully and the quotes
are correctly represented. However, I'd prefer not to include texinfo.tex
in my package.

When I updated texinfo to the latest version (5.2), I installed it this way
(i.e. as advised):
cd ~/src
wget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-5.2.tar.gz
tar -xzvf texinfo-5.2.tar.gz
cd texinfo-5.2
./configure --prefix=$HOME
make
make install
make TEXMF=$HOME/texmf install-tex

As a result of the last command, a file texinfo.tex was copied into
~/texmf/tex/texinfo/texinfo.tex. But at this point I have 2 questions:
1) why is the texinfo.tex file from texinfo-5.2 different from
http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/texinfo/texinfo.tex? Maybe a version 5.13 should
be created?
2) in the case where I copy myself
http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/texinfo/texinfo.tex into ~/texmf/tex/texinfo/ (and
I also run texhash), I encounter again the same error as before when I run
"make pdf", meaning that the file is not seen, why?

Sorry if these questions are already answered somewhere. I searched a
little but only found answers for Mac users.

ps: I'm working on a computer cluster used for scientific purpose in a
university and, in such settings, it's not uncommon to have very old
distributions, meaning that the admin (or each user) has to install
programs by himself

Timothée Flutre


2014-06-19 19:38 GMT+02:00 Karl Berry <[email protected]>:

> Thanks for updating your Texinfo, but doing that does not necessarily
> update texinfo.tex.  And apparently it did not in your case -- at least,
> that would explain why the command is not defined.
>
> To repeat, please try getting the current version from
> http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/texinfo/texinfo.tex.  You can put in the
> directory with the document.
>
> pdftex, pdfetex, and pdfetexk are all the same thing.
>
>     This is pdfeTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
>
> It has nothing to do with the problem, but that is almost ten years old.
> Pretty impressive :).
>
> Best,
> Karl
>

Reply via email to