* Karl Berry, [email protected] [31/01/15 00:53]: > Walter and all -- first, in txi-ca.tex, it seemed better to use > \dotless{i} than \char16, and also there was an erroneous \char{16} in > one case. > > More interestingly, I defined 00b7 in UTF-8, and made the definition (in > Latin 1 too) use \cdot instead of $^.$. I also defined a bunch more > "easy" characters in the latin blocks, many suboptimally, but that's > what we can do here. > > To my eyes, unfortunately, the superscripted period has the better > positioning for Ldot and ldot, but \cdot has the better weight. I could > play around with kerning and such, but I will await your views on > whether that is worth the trouble. > > My simple test file below (for texinfo.tex only, won't go through makeinfo). > > Karl > > \input texinfo > @setfilename catalan.info > > @documentlanguage ca > > @node X > @chapter chap > > Hello. @xref{X}. @thistitle > > @U{013F} @U{0140} > > @bye
Thanks Karl, I'd like to try it and see how it looks. How can I get your txi-ca.tex? And can I throw it in my texinfo installation or should I try it from a clone of the development branch? I have texinfo 5.2.0 in my system. -- Walter Garcia-Fontes
