> Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 23:36:16 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > > > Eli > This has come up before, so I suggest to look up past discussions, > > > around the time the option mentioned below was introduced. > > > > > >> For comparison, the output of makeinfo 4.13 (using the --force option): > > > > > > Btw, makeinfo 4.13 has the --commands-in-node-names for this. > > > > --commands-in-node-names was in texinfo 4.0 released September 1999, > > and --force in 3.11, in July 1997. The mail archives at > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/ only go back to > > September 2000.
There was also [email protected], perhaps Karl could tell if its archives are still available somewhere. I found its archive from August 2003 to June 2008 (when it was discontinued) here: http://ff0.org/pipermail/texinfo-pretest/ > I'll try to dig into my mail archives, maybe I will find something. There was this discussion in 2003: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2003-05/msg00055.html (it continued in June). It mentions @value and macros as potentially useful commands in node names. Also this one, which provides a real use case: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2003-06/msg00044.html That's all I could find, HTH.
