David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes:

> Gavin Smith <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On 15 August 2015 at 20:27, Gavin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Here's another patch.
>>
>> It's been pointed out to me that this patch doesn't apply cleanly. It
>> should be okay if you ignore the failed hunks, otherwise try the
>> attached.
>
> With that patch, compilation of the LilyPond documentation completes and
> looks correct at a cursory viewing.

I have currently taken Texinfo from

svn://svn.savannah.gnu.org/texinfo/trunk@6541

and it apparently compiles LilyPond documentation.  Before checking it
into the LilyPond repository (which will lead to more thorough feedback
in about two weeks of time when it has percolated to a developer
release): is that a sensible point of reference?  Or should I rather
wait some more before synching?

-- 
David Kastrup

Reply via email to