On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:57:08PM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > Is the "see also" feature something that anybody > > wants or is it just theoretical? > > I want it. The gawk manual has both See and See Also in its index. > > Hmm... Here are two entries in the current manual: > > @cindex output record separator, See @code{ORS} variable > @cindex @code{print} statement, See Also redirection@comma{} of output > > I guess these become: > > @cindex output record separator @see{@code{ORS} variable} > @cindex @code{print} statement @seealso{redirection@comma{} of output} > > (Can texinfo.tex add back the comma before the @see/@seealso?) > > Leading to: > > @entry{output record separator, See ORS variabale}{}{output record > separator @see{@code{ORS} variable}} > @entry{print statement, See Also redirection, of output}{}{@code{print} > statement @seealso{redirection@comma{} of output}} > > Thoughts?
What is this supposed to look like in the kind of index formatting that texinfo.tex uses, with the dot leaders? Should the leaders be present or not for a "see"? (I guess not.) Where does a "see also" appear in relation to the leaders and the other page numbers? (I guess after all the page numbers, after the leaders.) What precedent is there for this? It is much more common for there to be no leaders when an index is formatted and for the page numbers to follow the index entry immediately. I tried to check if similar output could be output for LaTeX, but I didn't find how to get the dot leaders type of index formatting in the time I spent on it.
