On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:07 PM Hans-Bernhard Bröker <[email protected]> wrote: > OTOH if what these calls are supposed to be doing is really is "copy n > bytes", it would be more honest to replace them by variations of > > memcpy (dest + strlen(dest), src, n); > > (with some actual book-keeping to replace the repeated determination of > strlen(dest), obviously). >
This may be better although we'd have to check that the final string remained null-terminated in all instances.
