On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 07:30:22PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 07:31:03AM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:03:51PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > To debug the use of tex4ht and latex2html, it is much better to keep 
> > > > tests/*/raw_out_parser.  For most other cases it is not as important as 
> > > > there is no difference between out_parser and raw_out_parser.  
> > > > 
> > > > Would it be ok to keep the directory?  It may require removing all the
> > > > raw_out_parser files for make distcheck, though.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I don't understand the issues involved here.  Why cannot 
> > > raw_out_parser
> > > be treated the same way as out_parser for the purposes of distcheck?
> > 
> > I would prefer if it as that way.  But right now raw_out_parser is
> > removed in run_parser_all.sh after the tests where run and the diff
> > were done.  I would prefer if the raw_out_parser directory was kept and
> > treated like out_parser for distcheck.
> 
> Can I do that change?

Yes, I see no problem with it.

Reply via email to