On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:25:00AM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > > > Sure, but Patrick is not (if I understand correctly) trying to have exported > documents validate properly in general, but to have some kind of internal > validation now while he develops the new output. > > Once that is acquired, and we can declare that texinfo output is whatever > form of HTML that's been chosen here I fail to see why using "html" is wrong > or problematic.
Actually, it is good practice to check against from time to time to check if the documents are still valid after adding functionalities/commands. So it may make sense to set the doctype to be able to check validity, even with older formats. That being said, I am still in favor of using the latest doctype that texi2any output is compatible with. -- Pat
