On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 07:11:11PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote: > I think it makes sense to consider the node to end at the @part command.
I agree, and that is what I actually assumed for DocBook code (not related to ignoring Top node but more in link with where @part content should appear). > Do you think you can do something similar for texi2any, i.e. not include > the @part line in the preceding node? I'll do that. Hopefully it only implies changing the association with tree units, but I'll see. > > If, instead, the @part is between the @node and @chapter, the output is > > correct in TeX, HTML, and DocBookbut this is not what is expected. > > > > @node Top > > @top top > > > > @node chapter node > > @part Part I > > @chapter chapter > > > > @bye > > Perhaps there will be no need for this unusual ordering. Indeed. -- Pat
