On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 02:22:04PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > I like 1) better, but there is a risk of files having the same name but > in two different directories. > > Ideas, comments? >
One idea is the images do not have to have the same base file name as the source images. They could named using increasing numbers. For example, /b/c.png could be named something like 0004.png, which would lose the original file name completely, but which would avoid the issue of duplicate file names. I don't feel strongly about which solution might be the best.
