>>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:42:18 +0200, Patrice Dumas <[email protected]> said:
>> I guess we could use @w for "The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual"
>> there (but I never read emacs docs in html, so Iʼm the wrong person to
>> offer an opinion).
Patrice> I think that it would avoid more unwanted break in HTML, though
there
Patrice> could still be. But I think that the main issue is whether, in a
Patrice> printed manual, not breaking in "The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual"
gives
Patrice> the wanted results, that triggered using @w in the first place.
To be honest, Iʼd have no issue with that phrase being broken over two
lines in a printed manual, and as Eli has pointed out in a different
message itʼs unnecessary to break in info and html.
Robert
--
