On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 02:01:13PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote: > I don't see the purpose of this as documents should use a sectioning > command, not a @*heading command after a node.
I disagree, I think that @*heading command after a node is a natural setting for a manual organized in topics that do not follow a sectionning tree. Like it can be done with dita/mallard/DocBook topics. In the interpretation that @node is an output unit delimiter, it should be possible to have content linked to and from nodes to follow different organization than a sectioning tree. > I understand USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE as a minor alteration for the > HTML output (possibly other formats) to avoid duplication in headings, > but one which only makes a difference in rare cases. I think that we should make writing manuals in the topics style simpler and more natural, associating @node to @*headings and having that possibility work well would be a step in that direction. -- Pat
