> From: Gavin Smith <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 21:25:48 +0100
> 
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 10:11:11PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 09:03:47PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > So the variety and prevalance of Info readers that support such entries
> > > may actually be quite low.  Another point in favour of texi2any always
> > > surrounding the node name with DEL in such entries.
> > 
> > So, should it be done or not?
> 
> I think we should do it.  I wanted to see if anybody else had an opinion on
> it.

Whatever you decide to do, please make sure the resulting format
conventions and requirements are clearly and accurately described in
the relevant sections of "Info Format Specification".  What is
currently in that part of the manual is evidently incomplete and/or
inaccurate, witness the number of times I missed some subtlety, only
to discover it by trial and error.  In particular, the reference from
"Info Format Menu" to "Info Format Cross Reference" is misleading
because the formats are subtly different.  A formal description of the
Info file's format should be free of such inaccuracies.

TIA

Reply via email to