Aha. Cygwin uses newlib for it's libc. So this seems to be a symptom of a newlib problem. I'll let the appropriate folks know. Thanks for the insight.
cheers, -Matt > Doesn't libc do exactly this already? Why does it need to be done > twice, here and in libc too? > > Also, that "(int)stdout" cast to 'int' makes me nervous. That > cast shouldn't be there. > > Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-textutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-textutils