Aha.  Cygwin uses newlib for it's libc.  So this seems to be a symptom of a
newlib problem.  I'll let the appropriate folks know.  Thanks for the
insight.

cheers,
-Matt

> Doesn't libc do exactly this already?  Why does it need to be done
> twice, here and in libc too?
>
> Also, that "(int)stdout" cast to 'int' makes me nervous.  That
> cast shouldn't be there.
>
> Bob




_______________________________________________
Bug-textutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-textutils

Reply via email to