Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I like the idea of simplifying things. I suggest just doing one tool > > at first and seeing how the feedback goes. > > And what's wrong with using argp? It's there, it's tested and used.
One objection might be the lack of a standard standalone version of argp, for use with non-glibc systems. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) actually maintains a standalone version (I think for use with `lsh'); I've been meaning to reconcile that with glibc, but have been sadly remiss in doing so [he's been patiently sending me email for several years!]. -Miles -- Saa, shall we dance? (from a dance-class advertisement) _______________________________________________ Bug-textutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-textutils
